The AI image generators I tested were: DALL-E 2, Midjourney, Shutterstock, Canva, Dream AI, Deep AI, Fotor and Dezgo. There are many more!
Text-to-image AI generators typically use a combination of natural language processing (NLP) and computer vision techniques to generate images from text descriptions. The process typically begins with a user inputting a text description, such as “a plumber fixing a leaking sink.” The AI model then uses NLP to understand the meaning of the text and maps it to a corresponding image.
One of the key techniques used by text-to-image generators is deep learning, which involves training a model on a large dataset of images and their associated text descriptions. This allows the model to learn the relationship between text and image, and to generate new images based on text input.
The models are trained to generate images in two steps, first, a text encoder which will take a textual description and encode it into a feature vector. Next, the image generator takes the feature vector and generates an image.
The generated image can be further improved by an image refinement network that takes the generated image and the text description as input and fine-tunes the image to make it more realistic and coherent with the description.
AI generators are not perfect and the generated images may not be perfect but as the technology advances and more data is used to train the models, the generated images will become more realistic and coherent with the input text.
The time it takes for a text-to-image AI generator to create an image can vary depending on the complexity of the image and the capabilities of the specific model being used.
In general, the time taken will depend on the number of layers in the model, the size of the dataset it was trained on and the computational resources available.
For simple images, the process can take just a few seconds. But for more complex images, it can take several minutes or longer. Additionally, if the AI model is running on a personal computer, it might take a longer time than if it’s running on a powerful server with multiple GPUs.
The images below were created in response to the text: “Captain Cook’s ship Endeavour arriving in New Zealand and being greeted by Māori warriors”. You can see that the AI’s understanding of what “Māori” means is somewhat limited. Some of them entirely avoided any attempt at Māori warriors and instead focussed on better-understood European clothing or South American tribal regalia.
[slb_group
The AI model is trained on a dataset of images, which it uses to learn the relationship between text descriptions and images. When a text description is provided, the model uses this learned relationship to generate a new image that is based on, but not identical to, the images in its training dataset.
It’s also important to note that text-to-image AI generators are not able to reproduce images that are protected by copyright laws. They can only generate new images based on the input text.
It’s possible that the generated images might have a resemblance to existing images, but that’s due to the model’s understanding of the text and its ability to generate images based on the understanding of the text which might be similar to the existing images.
That being said, copyright laws and their application to AI-generated images can be complex and it’s important to be aware of them when using these tools.
AI art generators have the potential to automate certain aspects of the art-making process, but it’s unlikely that they will completely replace human artists. While text-to-image generators can generate new images based on text descriptions, they still lack the ability to create art that is truly original and expressive in the way that human artists can.
AI art generators are based on machine learning models that were trained on a large dataset of images and text descriptions, this means that the models can only generate images within the scope of the data they were trained on. Human artists, on the other hand, can draw inspiration from a wide range of sources, including their own experiences and emotions, which allows them to create art that is truly unique and expressive.
Moreover, AI art generators are not able to replicate the personal touch and the creative process that human artist puts into their work. The art generated by AI is based on the understanding of the text and the data it was trained on, and it lacks the human touch, the emotions and the story behind the art that makes it unique and valuable.
In summary, AI art generators can assist human artists in creating art, but they are unlikely to replace them entirely. They can be used as a tool to generate new ideas, speed up certain processes, or generate variations on an existing theme. But the final piece of art will always have a human touch, interpretation, and interpretation that can’t be replicated by a machine.
Additionally, it’s important to note that AI art generators are not able to replace the creative process, the experimentation and the exploration of new techniques and styles that are integral to the art-making process. Human artists are always looking for new ways to express themselves and to push the boundaries of what is possible, which is something that AI art generators cannot do.
In the end, AI art generators can be seen as a tool for artists to use, but it’s not a replacement for human creativity, imagination and the ability to tell stories through art. They can make the process more efficient, but the final product will still depend on the human touch, interpretation and artistic vision.
Not quite convincing (Midjourney)
Determining whether an image is generated by AI can be challenging, but there are a few ways to identify whether an image is likely to be AI-generated.
One way to determine if an image is AI-generated is to examine the image for signs of manipulation or unrealistic elements. AI-generated images may contain inconsistencies such as unnatural lighting, unrealistic shadows, or objects that have been added or removed. Additionally, AI-generated images may show a lack of realism in some aspects, such as the textures, lighting, or the overall style of the image.
Another approach is to use reverse image search, which allows you to search for an image using an image instead of keywords. This can help you find the original source of an image and can help you determine if an image has been manipulated or if it’s an AI-generated image.
Another way to check if an image is AI-generated is to look for the watermark or the logo of the company or the website that generated the image if it’s available. Many AI image generators have a watermark on their generated images.
It’s important to note that these methods are not foolproof, and it’s still possible for AI-generated images to be indistinguishable from real images. Therefore, it’s important to approach images with a healthy dose of skepticism, especially if the image is being used to support a claim or to spread information.
As AI technology advances, it’s likely that new methods for identifying AI-generated images will be developed, and it’s important to stay informed about the latest techniques and tools for detecting AI-generated images.
AI is changing how people shop online, with ChatGPT and Google now recommending products directly…
If your Google Ads are sending every click to the same page, you're likely missing…
Time lapse videos can bring your website to life by showing your work in action.…
Running an online store without clear policies can lead to confusion, complaints, and lost trust.…
With short-form content dominating social media, is there still value in writing long blog posts?…
Getting people to visit your website is one thing; turning that interest into real leads…